Mercy Hospital of Devils Lake Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352367360
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 7016622131
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,158
- Expenses
- $302,795
- Assets
- $259,613
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARIANN DOELING (PRESIDENT/CEO CHI MERCY HOSPITAL OF DEVILS LAKE (E)
- TANNER WHITE (EX OFFICIO BM/PRESIDENT OF MERCY HOSPITAL OF DEVIL)
Highest reported compensation
- TIM SCHNACK (MARKET CFO): $368,286 total reported compensation
- NICK O'TOOL (FORMER OFFICER): $346,543 total reported compensation
- MARIANN DOELING (PRESIDENT/CEO CHI MERCY HOSPITAL OF DEVILS LAKE (E): $290,438 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
What it reported doing in 2024
Mercy hospital of devils lake foundation ("foundation") was incorporated as a legal entity in 2009 and has been granted 501(c)(3), tax-exempt status. The foundation's purpose is to serve as the official gift-receiving and gift-administration agency of mercy hospital of devils lake.the goal of the foundation's staff and board of directors is to raise funds through special events, annual giving, major gifts, planned giving, corporate/foundation grants, and capital campaigns to help fund the health care programs and project and community outreach services offered by mercy hospital of devils lake.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 74% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 28
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,774%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 76%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 1 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $303K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $368K · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 329 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.