Mercy Hospital Gift Shop Aka Mercy Auxiliary Volunteer Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
381630480
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Port Huron, MI, USA
Phone
8109871013
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,680
Expenses
$25,438
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARILYN MOSS (DIRECTOR; PRESIDENT)
  • ESTHER VASQUEZ (DIRECTOR; 1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARGARET LANGOLF (DIRECTOR; 2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SANDY BONITO (DIRECTOR; PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARILYN MOSS (DIRECTOR; PRESIDENT)
  • ESTHER VASQUEZ (DIRECTOR; 1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARGARET LANGOLF (DIRECTOR; 2ND VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Volunteer services to st. Joseph mercy port huron hospital and to the port huron community

What it reported doing in 2015

Mavo (mercy auxiliary volunteer organization) is a non-profit group whose purpose is to advance the welfare of st. Joseph mercy port huron through ways approved by both hospital administration and the mavo board. It shall reflect at all times the mission, vision, values, and philosphy of both the hospital and trinity health. The purpose is accomplished through the operation of a gift and flower shop, service to the hospital and its patients, through fundraising, and through additional services to expanded hospital satellites serving out-reach programs in the community.mavo was merged with and all of its assets distributed to prime healthcare foundation dba lake huron foundation, an irc section 501(c)(3) public charity supporting the community of port huron, Michigan.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 86% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 71% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -280.8%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -8.8% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2009 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.