Mercy Health Partners - Northeast Region Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232813196
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010
- Location
- Scranton, PA, USA
- Phone
- 5136392800
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,002,415
- Expenses
- $18,814,028
- Assets
- $5,761,174
- Liabilities
- $9,269,742
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mercy health partners extends the healing ministry of jesus by improving the health of our communities with emphasis on people who are poor and under-served. Mercy health partners demonstrates behaviors reflecting our core values of compassion, excellence, human dignity, justice, sacredness of life, and service. Together we commit to: compassion: our commitment to serve with mercy and tenderness. Excellence: our commitment to be the best in the quality of our services and the stewardship of our resources. Human dignity: our commitment to value the diversity of all persons and to be respectful and inclusive of everyone. Justice: our commitment to act with integrity, honesty and truthfulness. Sacredness of life: our commitment to reverence all life and creation. Service: our commitment to respond to those in need.
What it reported doing in 2010
Mercy health partners - northeast region, inc. Extends the healing ministry of jesus by improving the health of our communities with emphasis on people who are poor and under-served. Mercy health partners is the parent company of seven subsidiaries and provides services and support to its affiliated health care entities, including but not limited to providing strategic leadership, focusing resources to assure the healing mission, effectively managing care, improving clinical outcomes, and reducing operating costs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 85
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 68.5%; rating input score 69; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.61; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.1%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 12 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 22 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 149 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.