Mercy Health Foundation St Francis
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431873914
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Mountain View, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3145796100
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $92,239
- Expenses
- $353,952
- Assets
- $1,644,543
- Liabilities
- $1,988
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SIMPSON-NEASBY KAREN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- BARBER JAMES (PRESIDENT, FOUNDATION)
Highest reported compensation
- BARBER JAMES (PRESIDENT, FOUNDATION): $558,145 total reported compensation
- ROBERTS WILLIAM J (CFO): $492,044 total reported compensation
- DAVIS VALERIE (ADMINISTRATOR & BOARD MEMBER): $223,579 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.
What it reported doing in 2024
Mercy health foundation st. Francis helped live mercy's mission to provide care to everyone who needed it by supporting charity care and community outreach services. Donations supported the provision of charity care at mercy facilities, capital needs, and programs identified to benefit patients cared for at mercy hospitals and outreach locations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 94.2%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.04 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.1%; rating input score 99; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 71.4%; rating input score 71; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -283.7%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.65; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 46.2%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $334K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $558K · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 81 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.