Mercy Health Foundation Fort Scott
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 481077073
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Fort Scott, KS, USA
- Phone
- 3145796100
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Hospital, General
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $0
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DRINKWITZ JEREMY (PRESIDENT, MERCY JOPLIN COMMUNITIES)
- CIARAMITA JEFFREY (PRESIDENT,SPEC SERV LINES-MERCY HEALTH)
Highest reported compensation
- CIARAMITA JEFFREY (PRESIDENT,SPEC SERV LINES-MERCY HEALTH): $1,924,208 total reported compensation
- DRINKWITZ JEREMY (PRESIDENT, MERCY JOPLIN COMMUNITIES): $933,280 total reported compensation
- STURGEON TYLER (FORMER OFFICER): $633,088 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.
What it reported doing in 2024
The supported entity, mercy fort scott hospital, was closed in january 2019.mercy health foundation fort scott is in the process of being dissolved.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 53
- Accountability: 28
- Sustainability: NotEnoughData
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -18.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.9M · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 7 of 9 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 80 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series filing activity did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.