Merced Rescue Mission Support Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
853640660
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Merced, CA, USA
Phone
2097229269
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$270,778
Expenses
$138,678
Assets
$11,948,194
Liabilities
$8,256,762

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRUCE METCALF (PRESIDENT/CEO)

People named in this filing

  • KEITH WATERSON (DIRECTOR)
  • DAVID OGILBEE (DIRECTOR)
  • BRUCE METCALF (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the merced rescue mission support corporation is to build and provide facilities for the merced rescue mission and mission merced incorporated to carry out their mission. The mission of the merced rescue mission and mission merced is to serve unhoused people of merced county; and provide hope and life transformation through jesus christ.

What it reported doing in 2024

Merced rescue mission operates a new life transformation program called "hope for men," "hope for women." these are 9-12 month receive men and women who have been incarnated, have experienced homelessness, struggle with addiction issues or simply feel hopeless. These programs address addiction issues and build life skills that help people become self-sustaining through finding jobs. Family reunifications are also an important part of this program.mission merced operates the navigations center and multiple bridging houses which provide a service rich environment for people who have come from the streets. These services include showers, clothing, and shelter, and case management which helps people with health care and permanent housing.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 72% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 20
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 87
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 16.4%; rating input score 16
  • Program expense ratio: 32%; rating input score 32
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 48.8%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 86.16; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.69; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 30.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 16.4% of revenue deployed · 32% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $44K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.