Meramec Community Enhancement Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431781474
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Saint James, MO, USA
- Phone
- 5732652993
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $89,536
- Expenses
- $97,019
- Assets
- $105,540
- Liabilities
- $87,284
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
People named in this filing
- Greg Edwards (Chairman)
- Danny Brown (Secretary)
- Gary Hicks (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide programs that increase the social, economic, educational, health-related and recreational opportunities to the residents of the Meramec region.
What it reported doing in 2023
Missouri Department of Economic Development Grant for affordable connectivity program outreach. The Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) is a US government program run by the Federal Communications Commission to help low-income households pay for internet service and connected devices like a laptop or tablet. The ACP Outreach Grant Program provides eligible governmental and non-governmental entities with the funding and resources needed to increase awareness of and participation in the ACP among those eligible households most in need of affordable connectivity. Total Program Service expenses $10,970 include: contract services, $10,057 and supplies $913
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.4%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.83; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 60.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 62% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 42.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $81K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.