Merakey
Legal name: Merakey Philadelphia
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232175923
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lafayette Hill, PA, USA
- Phone
- 1-888-647-0020
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Mental Health Center
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $27,437,917
- Expenses
- $27,760,917
- Assets
- $19,114,646
- Liabilities
- $2,902,106
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSEPH MARTZ (DIRECTOR/CEO)
- ROBERT NIX III ESQ (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOSEPH MARTZ (DIRECTOR/CEO): $1,367,764 total reported compensation
- DERRICK YACOVELLI (CFO/TREASURER/SECRETARY): $818,642 total reported compensation
- MALCOLM MUSGROVE (VP/VP,ABH): $354,903 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Merakey provides personalized, high quality care to individuals and families across the country.
What it reported doing in 2024
Residential programs merakey philadelphia's adult behavioral health residential programs continue to serve as a critical component of the city's behavioral health continuum for adults with severe and persistent mental illness. Spanning more than 122 residential beds across long-term structured residences (ltsr) and community residential rehabilitation (crr) programs, these services provide clinically informed, recovery-oriented housing designed to promote stability and long-term success in the community.in close collaboration with the philadelphia department of behavioral health and intellectual disability services (dbhids), the programs maintain an efficient and coordinated referral process that ensures timely access to appropriate levels of care. This partnership supports continuity, minimizes service gaps, and strengthens outcomes for individuals transitioning from higher levels of care.in the past year, the residential portfolio demonstrated exceptional regulatory and operational performance, including a seamless omhsas state audit completed with zero citations. This achievement reflects strong leadership, consistent adherence to regulatory standards, and the dedication of multidisciplinary teams who prioritize quality, safety, and person-centered care.additionally, the programs have sustained a therapeutic residential environment that supports recovery, reduces unnecessary hospital utilization, and fosters increased independence for residents. Collectively, these accomplishments underscore merakey's continued commitment to delivering high-quality residential services that promote dignity, stability, and meaningful progress toward recovery.community integrated recovery centers (circs) merakey philadelphia operates two community integrated recovery centers (circs), collectively serving over 150 men and women with severe and persistent mental illness. These programs are distinguished by their innovative use of creative arts therapies including music, visual arts, and manual arts to support consumers' recovery journeys. By fostering self-expression and emotional healing, these therapies enhance participants' overall well-being and engagement in their recovery process.outpatient mental health clinics merakey philadelphia's outpatient mental health clinics provide critical support to a diverse population of over 2,300 adults and children. These clinics deliver targeted, evidence-based treatments designed to achieve measurable improvements in mental health outcomes. By emphasizing shorter, goal-directed episodes of care, the clinics empower individuals to achieve lasting progress while optimizing service efficiency.community-based programs merakey philadelphia's community-based programs underwent a strategic consolidation in fy24 to enhance collaboration and service integration. By bringing together traditional case management, mobile psychiatric rehabilitation, and peer support services, the programs now offer a more cohesive and holistic approach to meeting consumers' needs. This streamlined model fosters stronger connections between services, improving accessibility and outcomes for individuals receiving care.intensive behavioral health services (ibhs) school programs merakey philadelphia's ibhs school programs played a pivotal role in helping students reacclimate to classrooms following the challenges of the covid-19 pandemic. These programs provided targeted behavioral and emotional support to address the unique stressors students faced during the transition back to in-person learning. Initiatives included social-emotional learning workshops, individualized support plans, and proactive collaboration with school staff to create trauma-sensitive environments. These efforts fostered resilience, improved classroom engagement, and supported students in rebuilding social connections critical to their academic and personal success.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 52
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.4%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.7%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 90.4% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $24.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 39 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 53/100.