Merakey

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232799679
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Lafayette Hill, PA, USA
Phone
1-888-647-0020
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$199,660,409
Expenses
$187,415,260
Assets
$82,778,817
Liabilities
$23,500,317

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSEPH MARTZ (PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • REBECCA RICHWINE (VICE PRESIDENT/SVP,C&FS)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOSEPH MARTZ (PRESIDENT/CEO): $1,367,764 total reported compensation
  • DERRICK YACOVELLI (TREASURER/CFO): $818,642 total reported compensation
  • THEODORE DALLAS (DIRECTOR/COO): $775,126 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Merakey provides services to support men and women achieve their goals to be independent, safe, and contributing members of their communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Merakey Pennsylvania continued to focus on maintaining the health and safety of the individuals served while delivering services in fy25. Community and clinic-based programs connected individuals with increasing needs to community and other resources. Guiding merakey are the following: our purpose: putting our heart and soul into exceptional care.our vision: to be a nationally recognized provider of the highest quality health and human services.our core values: compassion, diversity, integrity, safety, trust, and qualitymerakey remains committed to the prevention of abuse through rigorous policies, screening, hiring, training, supervision, monitoring, and consumer participation. Supported by our praesidium accreditation, we maintain a zero tolerance environment for abuse of any kind.operational progress and system enhancementsstrengthening quality, safety, and care coordinationresidential programs for individuals with idd and behavioral health needs continued to prioritize safety and stability. Harrisburg personal care homes significantly reduced licensing citations under new administrative leadership and close collaboration with qco.north central pa advanced whole person care through individual care coordination meetings at schuylkill and pocono mountain centers. Schuylkill crr also secured onetime funding for renovations, safety upgrades, and security enhancements.technology and documentation improvementsmerakey's operations, qco, and it teams continued work with eleos health to transition home and community hab/companion services from paper to mobile electronic documentation. This shift will improve efficiency, compliance, and competitiveness in the market.ddtt teams advanced avatar optimization, completing a second round of forms review to reduce redundancies and improve reporting accuracy. Updated clinical trainings now mirror avatar language, and a new training coordinator is implementing structured onboarding processes.program achievements across pennsylvaniaact/fact- successful carf survey resulting in another 3-year accreditation- pocono act moved from provisional to full license- expansion planning underway, including primary care integration in baton rouge act programsadult behavioral health- outpatient programs in schuylkill, anthra plaza, and drug & alcohol services ended the year ahead of budget- residential treatment facility for adults beat budget and earned its first carf accreditation- blended case management fully staffed with a positive yearend bottom linepeer supports exceeded budget - rise forensic ltsr, russelton ltsr, and beaver ltsr maintained strong census and staffing- mcrt presented at statewide conferences and continues to expand mobile crisis competency across countiesidd services- successful hiring of medical coordinators across regions- advisory groups in susquehanna strengthened community engagement and charitable partnerships- continued challenges with staffing, referrals, and medical access addressed through targeted recruitment, training, and collaboration with state partnerschildren and family servicesfamily based services- lehigh and pocono mountain center family based programs ended the year with strong positive bottom lines- both programs maintained excellent performance in value based purchasing initiativesnew york programs- preventive services maintained performance despite staffing shortages and received an impact grant to support families- center for hope celebrated multiple youth graduations, expanded community outings, and continued to grow its garden, soapmaking, and enrichment programsfoster care- york/adams completed four adoptions, including three children and one adult with special needs- increased referrals across hpc and ffb foster care programsfunding, advocacy, and rate successes- needs exception allowances fully approved for four long underfunded programs in southwest pa- multiple programs received rate increases for the new fiscal year- ddtt expansion discussions underwa

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 64
  • Accountability: 42
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.6%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 89%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 16.7%; rating input score 17; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.1%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 83.6% of revenue deployed · 89% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $166.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 39 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 17/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.