Mental Health Collaborative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
990423596
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Wausau, WI, USA
Phone
7156000978
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health

Reported finances

Revenue
$44,626
Expenses
$68,459
Assets
$188,587
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Casey Nye (Chair)
  • Tara Draeger (Vice Chair)
  • Laura Scudiere (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Mental Health Collaborative is a 501c3 non-profit organization focusing on mental health and suicide prevention.

What it reported doing in 2025

Through a Memorandum of Understanding for Staff Support between the Marathon County Health Department (MCHD) & The Mental Health Collaborative (MHC), the MHC agrees to reimburse MCHD for time spent in quarterly payments of $14,000. Payments will occur on or before January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1. MCHD will invoice MHC for payment. Payments will not exceed $56,000 per calendar year. The purpose of this agreement is to outline partnership expectations between the Marathon County Health Department and The Mental Health Collaborative. Marathon County Health Department is providing staff resources and support to the Mental Health Collaborative with the aim to further our common community health goal of addressing Mental Health needs in Marathon County.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 99
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 98.5%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -53.4%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.75; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -134.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.9% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $67K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.