Mental Health Association of the Capital Region
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 231538396
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Harrisburg, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7172363300
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $154,910
- Expenses
- $168,026
- Assets
- $163,794
- Liabilities
- $3,657
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID SKERPON (PRESIDENT)
- SHELLEY RISER (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DAVID SKERPON (PRESIDENT)
- SHELLEY RISER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JANET KELLEY (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mental health advocacy and education
What it reported doing in 2013
Supported employment programs - provided oversight and direct supervision of the staff of cumberland/perry community support program (csp) and consumer/family satisfaction teams (cfst). Each program employs consumers of mental health services. Csp serves as a resource for individuals living with a mental health diagnosis. Cfst is tasked with surveying individuals receiving county-funded mental health services in an effort to assess quality, efficiency, and consumer satisfaction.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.2%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 59.9%; rating input score 60
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.5%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.2% of revenue deployed · 59.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $101K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.