Mental Health Association of Franklin County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
141779296
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Malone, NY, USA
Phone
5185213507
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,842,820
Expenses
$2,817,896
Assets
$2,123,504
Liabilities
$2,015,321

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANGELA BASHAW (PRESIDENT)
  • LEE RIVERS (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • LEE RIVERS (CEO): $110,854 total reported compensation
  • ROSE MARY MONETTE (CFIO): $71,384 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our staff of peer certified providers who have achieved significant recovery goals and overcome barriers, will use our own life experiences to model, coach and encourage others to boost hope and improve overall wellness.

What it reported doing in 2025

Community support services (see schedule o): community support services: mental health association of franklin county, inc. (d/b/a) community connections of franklin county assists individuals in our community who have lived experience to include but not limited to mental health, substance use, poverty, trauma, and more. Through the multiple programs offered in our agency, in 2025 we assisted approximately 3,702 individuals with their social determinant of health needs to include, but not limited to, shelter, food, heat, electricity, socialization, environmental, connection to primary care, mental health counseling, and substance use services. We utilize a meet people where they are at with a strength-based approach to improve their quality of life and reduce high utilization in the emergency department. Residents, providers, and county officials refer directly to our agency because they know we will help immediately and not put people in urgent need on a waitlist along with having the knowledge that we are able to obtain positive outcomes for individuals we assist in our community. Our services expanded to include a law enforcement partnership with the malone village police department to create the malone village police department community support initiative. We have assigned a licensed clinician to assist police officers who determine an individual has a behavioral health and/or substance use issue. We offered: advocacy (assisting individuals to understand systematic processes and connecting them to services, mutual support (our certified nys peer specialist offers one-on-one mutual support to individuals by sharing life experiences and how to overcome them), peer warm line, peer care coordinator (to connect individuals to services, and work out of uvm alice hyde medical center and adirondack medical center), our retail thrift store work experience programs assist adults and adolescents, male homeless shelter, outreach and engagement, peer network group, recipient service funds (help to assist individuals with social determinants of health issues), suicide prevention, suicide loss survivor group, family support advocates in saranac lake central school, chateaugay central school, brushton/moira central school and st. Regis falls central school, adult health home care management services, day by day mentoring services. We also added a warming/cooling center in november 2025 to assist those individuals with no place to stay to keep warm in the winter and cool in the summer months.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 73% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.1%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 85.9%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $552.28 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.95; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.5%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.1% of revenue deployed · 85.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $111K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.