Mental Health America of Pikes Peak Region

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
840507958
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990 2010
Location
Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Phone
7196334601
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$124,409
Expenses
$200,005
Assets
$190,402
Liabilities
$53,972

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To ensure that people with mental health issues in the pikes peak region have access to needed resources and be understood and accepted by the community.

What it reported doing in 2010

The collaborative (advancing Colorado's mental health care)-the agency serves as the managing partner of a community-wide systems change grant to address the concerns regarding the lack of complementary and succesful means for treating people with the co-occurring disorders of substance abuse and mental health issues. This five year effort, funded through a grant from a collaboration of Colorado foundations, builds community collaboration among all providers serving this population and focuses on treating those with this disorder as a whole person, addressing not only their addiction and mental health concerns, but also their housing, job, physical health care and other concerns.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -60.8%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.4%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $187K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $17K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.