Mental Health America of Greater Houston Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 741272394
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 7135238963
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Health
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,435,790
- Expenses
- $3,257,356
- Assets
- $2,754,044
- Liabilities
- $540,620
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Renae Vania Tomczak (President & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Renae Vania Tomczak (President & CEO): $226,735 total reported compensation
- Andrea Usanga (Chief Strategy & Innov Office): $154,051 total reported compensation
- Jamie Freeny DrPH (CSBH Director): $136,714 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To drive community solutions promoting mental health. Through innovative collaborations, education, and advocacy, we lead change to promote mental health and prevent mental illness in the Greater Houston region.
What it reported doing in 2025
Mental Health America of Greater Houston has been championing mental health in our community since 1954. We work to connect people to quality care, equip communities with education and training, provide peer support for veterans, and advocate for legislative solutions that meet our community's growing needs. In 2025, we served 5,510 unique individuals and had 21,154 total client engagements across our programs. See Schedule OIn 2025, we expanded our behavioral health navigation services, now known as Care Connect, a free, coordinated system that helps individuals find, access, and follow through with mental health care. More than a referral service, Care Connect guides people through the process and stays engaged until they are successfully connected to care. The program includes a database of more than 800 vetted providers offering a wide range of services for individuals and families. This resource can be accessed through an easy-to-use online search tool or by connecting directly with a live Community Resource Specialist via phone, text, or email for personalized support. Through peer support and collaborative partnerships, veterans continue to receive the services needed to reintegrate into civilian life. In 2025, working in collaboration with other veteran-serving organizations, a strong 86% of Veterans Treatment Court participants who were eligible for graduation completed the program requirements. Additionally, our veterans team made more than 4,000 referrals, connecting veterans to services that support their well-being and stability. Our Mental Health Literacy was expanded to offer specialized training to help organizations build cultures where people can perform at their best and feel supported along the way. Our Workplace Wellness training and consultation offerings are guided by a PhD-level expert with certification in mindfulness practices, adapted for organizational settings. In 2025, we delivered 93 mental health education and workplace wellness training sessions, significantly expanding our reach compared to 2024.Our public policy and advocacy efforts through policymaker engagement increased by more than 188% between 2024 and 2025. We also expanded our advocacy training, reaching 79 individuals, and increased participation in presentations on MHA-supported issues to 641 individuals.Our training for child-serving professionals - across schools and community organizations- included 35 presentations supporting adults who work with children. This includes a strong partnership with a statewide intermediary whose mission is to convene, educate, and advocate to improve the quality and increase the availability of out-of-school time opportunities for Texas youth. Through this partnership, we provided training to providers in a variety of programs that support student well-being. In 2025, 10,160 Greater Houston Region residents used Mental Health America's free, online, and anonymous mental health screenings. These screenings provide a direct, real-time measure of mental health and overall well-being in the Greater Houston Region. Upon completing the screening, each person can access tools and other resources to support their mental health.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 67.9%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.18 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 54.5%; rating input score 55; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -126.9%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 30.4%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 67.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $227K · 20 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 6/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.