Meningioma Mommas Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 412078438
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Highlands Ranch, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3035176029
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $26,205
- Expenses
- $15,899
- Assets
- $59,357
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Elizabeth Holzemer (President)
- Galynn Jacobs (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Elizabeth Holzemer (President)
- Galynn Jacobs (Vice President)
- Lindy Klarenbeek (Executive Dir.)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide support for individuals suffering from meningioma brain tumors and related illnesses.
What it reported doing in 2025
Meningioma Mommas is a 501c3 not-for-profit organization, which provides 24/7 online support and valuable resources to all those affected by meningioma brain tumors. We are dedicated to raising meningioma awareness and funding for meningioma specific research. To date we have donated $535,000 to fund research at the University of California San Francisco, Yale University, Department of Neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins University, the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, John Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint John's Health Center, University of Utah's Huntsman Cancer Institute, Ohio State University, Washington University in St Louis, the Barrow Neurological Institute, Harvard University, Massachusetts General Hospital, Dr Melanie Hayden Gephart at Stanford University, University of Colorado, and NYU Langone medical center.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.7%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.3%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.73; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 84.9%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.