Mendota Area Senior Service Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 362978819
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021
- Location
- Mendota, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8155397700
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $451,578
- Expenses
- $437,009
- Assets
- $138,838
- Liabilities
- $3,159
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALLEN BONNELL (President)
- MARY LOUISE AMBROSE (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- MICHELLE HANSEN (Director)
- REV KENT SVENDSEN (Director)
- DAWN TROMPETER (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Mendota Area Senior Service, Inc is to provide area seniors a variety of services that will improve their quality of life
What it reported doing in 2021
Outreach service: provides services similar to information services described above but expands the service to homebound/isolated seniors by going to their homes.provided approximately 800 units of service to 650 persons over the age of 60.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 12
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.7%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 70%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.2%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.7% of revenue deployed · 70% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 11 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $306K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2011 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.