Men Who Care Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814172285
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Rochester Hills, MI, USA
- Phone
- 2488857050
- Rating
- 92
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Philanthropy, Charity, Voluntarism Promotion
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $60,219
- Expenses
- $60,818
- Assets
- $14,093
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JUSTIN SWARBRICK (PRESIDENT)
- JUSTIN BERLIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JUSTIN SWARBRICK (PRESIDENT)
- JUSTIN BERLIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- VINCENT VITALE (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Men who care is a non-profit organization with a single mission of bettering our community. Our aim is to touch the lives of as many people in need as possible, in as many areas of need as possible. We accomplish this by performing vigorous due diligence on local non-profit organizations in metro detroit, upon completion we partner with these well run organizations to promote them, provide them funding and support via volunteers to help them continue their amazing efforts in improving the quality of life for the people of metro detroit.
What it reported doing in 2018
Made a grant to downtown boxing gym of $17,600. This allowed them to fund additional students in their program as they have 800 kids on their waiting list. Made a grant to love for a child of $17,600. This money was utilized to support their youth summer camp for 2018. Made a grant to feeding the need of macomb of $13,000. This money was utilized to pay their facility rental costs for the year. Made a grant to woodside vision foundation of $10,300 and christmas for a cause of $1,600.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99.8%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.8%; rating input score 99
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 99.8% of revenue deployed · 98.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $60K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.