Memphis Tennis Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
626046474
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Collierville, TN, USA
Phone
9014610300
Rating
49
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Racquet Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$166,535
Expenses
$155,051
Assets
$170,588
Liabilities
$899

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARLA GOODWIN (PRESIDENT)
  • JONATHAN YEN (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARLA GOODWIN (PRESIDENT)
  • CATHY SUMRALL (TREASURER & EXEC SECRETARY)
  • JONATHAN YEN (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Memphis Tennis Association is organized to promote the development of tennis as a means of healthful recreation and physical fitness; to establish and maintain rules of fair play and high standards of sportsmanship; and to further the growth and development of the sport of tennis.

What it reported doing in 2025

Promoted and supported USTA Adult and Juniors Tennis Leagues and various tournaments.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 9
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 8.9%; rating input score 9
  • Program expense ratio: 9.6%; rating input score 10

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.9%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.1; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -27.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.5% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 8.9% of revenue deployed · 9.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.