Memphis Child Advocacy Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581745787
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Memphis, TN, USA
- Phone
- 9015252377
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Child Abuse, Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,968,584
- Expenses
- $2,873,875
- Assets
- $14,432,609
- Liabilities
- $130,628
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VIRGINIA STALLWORTH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- VIRGINIA STALLWORTH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $151,151 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission is to serve children who are victims of sexual and severe physical abuse through prevention, education, and intervention.
What it reported doing in 2024
The memphis child advocacy center (cac) supports safety for children through prevention, community collaboration, and a team approach to healing and justice for victims of child sexual abuse and other severe abuse.the shelby county child protective investigative team (cpit) is headquartered at the memphis cac. Cpit includes representatives from the Tennessee department of children's services; the district attorney general's special victims unit; all shelby county law enforcement agencies; shelby county crime victims and rape crisis center; le bonheur children's hospital; and juvenile court. The team is responsible for the review, investigation, treatment, and prosecution of child sexual abuse and other severe abuse. In fy25, cpit reviewed 3,524 reported cases of child sexual abuse and other severe abuse. Memphis cac forensic interviewers use a nationally accepted protocol when interviewing children after reported abuse. The factfinding interviews are developmentally appropriate, culturally responsive, unbiased, and legally sound. In fy25, the memphis cac conducted forensic interviews with 621 children. Each digitally recorded interview was observed in real time by investigators via closed circuit television.in fy25, memphis cac therapists held 1,723 sessions with children, parents, and caregivers. The memphis cac provides trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy and other evidence based therapies. Outcome evaluation indicates that memphis cac therapy services result in significant improvement in post-traumatic stress symptoms in children who complete therapy. Evaluation also shows that parents/caregivers feel better equipped to support and protect their child.memphis cac family advocates arrange transportation to cac services, assist with crime victim compensation applications, access community resources, and help families navigate the legal system. In fy25, cac family advocates worked with 621 families and provided 460 connections to community resources.in addition to critical services for children who have been abused, the memphis cac provides prevention services. In fy25, the memphis cac provided stewards of children child sexual abuse prevention and response training to 1,028 shelby county adults. The training is research informed. It is designed for parents and adults who work with children in schools and daycares, faith-based organizations, healthcare institutions, and youth-serving organizations. Since 2011, over 31,000 unduplicated shelby county adults have taken the training. Six-month follow-up surveys indicate trainees show significant increases in specific actions that protect children. The memphis cac also offers policy workshops and consultation for youth-serving organizations.the memphis cac was one of first 25 child advocacy centers to open in the u.s.-now there are over 950. The cac was certified as a child abuse prevention agency by the state of Tennessee in 2001. A full member of the national children's alliance since 1992, the center meets the rigorous membership standards and was reaccredited in 2025. Recent accomplishments include an updated shelby county child protective investigation team (cpit) protocol. On december 3, 2025, the updated protocol was signed by leaders of the 15 cpit agencies including the district attorney's office, le bonheur children's hospital, the tn dept. Of children's services, all law enforcement in shelby county, and other agencies.the prevention town hall on september 25, 2025 was attended by community leaders and decision makers from the faith community, the justice system, and medical and social service organizations.for more information on the best practice prevention and intervention programs available at the memphis child advocacy center, visit memphiscac.org.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.9%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 83.9%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.2%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.02; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.9% of revenue deployed · 83.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $151K · 19 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.