Memorial Park Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
592765584
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2014, Form 990-N 2012
Location
Jacksonville, FL, USA
Phone
9047300440
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$130,997
Expenses
$146,636
Assets
$680,016
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PATRICK M EMMET (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PATRICK M EMMET (PRESIDENT)
  • ANN MACKEY (TREASURER)
  • BROOKS DAME (EXEC VICE PR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The memorial park association, inc. Is a 501(c)(3) Florida non-profit entity dedicated to the protection and preservation of memorial park in jacksonville, Florida.

What it reported doing in 2025

Memorial park association, inc. Is a 501(c)(3) Florida nonprofit entity dedicated to the protection and preservation of memorial park in jacksonville, Florida. The association was created in 1986 by a group of park enthusiasts and local philanthropists concerned with memorial park's persistent state of decline and disrepair, just a year after memorial park was included on the national register of historic places as part of the riverside (now riverside-avondale) national historic district. Memorial park is located at 1620 riverside avenue near the 5 points area of jacksonville, Florida and is one of jacksonville's best loved treasures. Located along the banks of the majestic st. Johns river, this six-acre park draws visitors from across the northeast Florida community. Soon after its formation, the association entered an adopt-a-park agreement with the city of jacksonville, which enables it to perform various operations and mainenance functions, including necessary physical improvements, consistent with the historical character of the park and concurrent with the city's obligation to maintain memorial park for the greater public good. In 1988, the association commissioned its first restoration plans for the park. In 1992, a project to restore the iconic memorial sculpture spiritualized life was initiated, the first since the sculpture's installation in 1924. Other restorations followed in 2004 and 2019. Since then, the association facilitated and funded numerous projects to further preserve and protect the park, including the installation of ornamental metal fencing around the perimeter, upgrades to the irrigation and lighting systems, the planting of oaks and other native vegetation, the renovation of the entrance piers, plaza, balustrades, and fountain basin, cleanup of the extensive damage caused by hurricane irma in 2017, and the dedication of marble benches to honor important friends of memorial park. Of particular note is the 2010 installation of two large scale bronze eagles created by artist diane lafond insetta to replace the original concrete eagles that had been damaged and destroyed. Typically, the association also organizes and hosts numerous speakers, musical events, and community activities in the park. After a pause because of covid 19, these activities have resumed.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 96.3%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.9%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.64; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $141K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.