Memorial Medical Care Pc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352491455
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-T 2024, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6462273092
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Home Health Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $204,164
- Expenses
- $3,601,411
- Assets
- $21,420,992
- Liabilities
- $28,327,588
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LISA DEANGELIS MD (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JEFFREY DREBIN MD (TREASURER): $3,111,344 total reported compensation
- LISA DEANGELIS MD (PRESIDENT): $2,297,875 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Memorial Medical Care P.C. ("MMC") is a professional corporation organized in New York and engaged in the practice of medicine. As of October 11, 2023, MMC operates a physician practice at 2236 Nostrand Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11210. The physician practice provides oncology services, primarily pre- and post-surgical consultations and bone marrow transplant assessments and related follow-up appointments, to patients from the Flatbush neighborhood and greater Brooklyn with the following cancers: blood, breast, gastrointestinal, gynecologic, head/neck, thoracic, and urologic.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization operates a physician practice in Brooklyn, NY, which provides oncology services, primarily pre- and post-surgical consultations and bone marrow transplant assessments and related follow-up appointments, to patients from the Flatbush neighborhood and greater Brooklyn with the following cancers: blood, breast, gastrointestinal, gynecologic, head/neck, thoracic, and urologic. DURING 2023, THE ORGANIZATION TREATED 17 HOMEBOUND BMT PATIENTS AND REFERRED PATIENTS TO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOR TREATMENT.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 18
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,664%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.95; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.32; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 65.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 29.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 42.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3.1M · 2 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 34 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.