Memorial Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
370684691
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Carthage, IL, US
Phone
217-357-8500
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$59,703,076
Expenses
$57,428,868
Assets
$53,537,307
Liabilities
$21,835,369

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Doug Groth (President)
  • Brenda Young (Vice President)
  • Ada Bair (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Victoria Kalivoda-Popela DO (Director): $644,875 total reported compensation
  • Peter Perll MD (Surgeon): $615,498 total reported compensation
  • Drake White MD (Surgeon): $594,076 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve the health and well-being of the communities we serve.

What it reported doing in 2025

Memorial Hospital is dedicated to maintaining and improving the health of all people in the Hancock County area. Governed by a Board of Directors, we serve as a vital safety net, serving our communities with access to quality healthcare services. Memorial Hospital provides many types of community benefit care. Community benefit care includes charity care, community health fairs, lectures, and free health screenings, demonstrating our commitment to improving the overall health of the residents of the Hancock County area.In 2025 the Hospital had 2,553 patient days with 535 admissions and 532 discharges. (Continued on Schedule O)There were 6,138 emergency room visits, 1,376 provider-based physician clinic visits, 14,243 independent physician visits and 44,723 rural health physician clinic visits.We are always committed to providing compassionate care to every member of our community regardless of their ability to pay.To fulfill its mission of community service, the Organization provides care to patients and residents who meet certain criteria under its charity care policy without charge or at amounts less than its established rates. Revenue from services to these patients and residents is recorded in the accounting system at the established rates, but the Organization does not pursue collection of the amounts. The resulting adjustments are recorded as adjustments to patient and resident service revenue, depending on the timing of the charity determination.The Illinois legislature passed a bill titled the "Hospital Uninsured Patient Discount Act." Effective April 1, 2009, this Act requires hospitals to provide certain mandated discounts from charges to the uninsured in Illinois. Charges are to be discounted at 135% of cost. Furthermore, a hospital may not collect more than 25% of an uninsured family's gross income in any one year.The Organization provides health care services to patients and residents who meet certain criteria under its charity care policy without charge or at amounts less than established rates. Since the Organization does not pursue collection of these amounts, they are not reported as patient and resident service revenue. The estimated cost of providing these services was $580,000 for the year ended December 31, 2025, calculated by multiplying the ratio of cost to gross charges for the Organization by the gross uncompensated charges associated with providing charity care to its patients and residents.In addition, the Organization provides services to other medically indigent patients under certain government-reimbursed public aid programs. Such programs pay providers amounts which are less than established charges for the services provided to the recipients, and for some services the payments are less than the cost of rendering the services provided. The Organization also commits significant time and resources to endeavors and critical services which meet otherwise unfulfilled community needs. Many of these activities are sponsored with the knowledge that they will not be self-supporting or financially viable.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 94% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.3%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.8%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.5%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 82.3% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $48.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $645K · 25 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.5M reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.