Mel Bruechert Ministries

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
393571010
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Costa Mesa, CA, USA
Phone
9498879340
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,015
Expenses
$35,899
Assets
$36,881
Liabilities
$5,765

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MELANIE BRUECHERT (PRESIDENT/CEO)

People named in this filing

  • MELANIE BRUECHERT (PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • SILVIA VARGAS (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS/TREASURER)
  • RYAN MANNE (DIRECTOR OF MINISTRY RECORDS)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mel bruechert ministries brings christ's love to costa mesa to the ends of earth. Outreach is to local youth and surrounding adults, to meet spiritual, physical, and basic needs. We pastor several youth homes, reach parents, schools and seminarians. We provide meals, bible study, change culture, and stretch the church to meet the local and nations.

What it reported doing in 2025

Pastoral support: three youth homes by bringing church services directly to orphans, meeting practical needs, and helping develop responsible citizens who serve their communities. The long-term goal is to reach all youth homes in the costa mesa and newport beach areas with continued support to the aged out foster adults, as well as spiritual guidance and strength to staff.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 79% for direct work, and 21% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 43.1%; rating input score 43
  • Program expense ratio: 78.5%; rating input score 79

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 46.4%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.03; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 43.1% of revenue deployed · 78.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $28K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.