MeHug
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 475390612
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 4807077140
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $77,436
- Expenses
- $77,334
- Assets
- $61,128
- Liabilities
- $42,733
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Adriana Carbajal (Vice President)
- Everk Sanchez (CEO)
- Everk Sanchez (CEO)
People named in this filing
- Mitzi Perez (Secretary)
- Marla Bezares (Director)
- Adriana Carbajal (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to support families where children have been diagnosed with a chronic illness.
What it reported doing in 2023
MeHug provides support to underrepresented latino families in Arizona who are having difficulties and challenges as a result of a family member diagnosed with a disability or a critical illness. We helped more than 40 families understand and navigate the special education system by offering education, guidance and referrals brought our Puent-Ed Program. MeHug offers emergency cash-grants to the families we serve. Depending on the need, emergency cash-grants go from $500 to 2,500 per family with our program Leilani. Emergency Cash-grants are always revised and approved by CEO. By the end of Dec 2023, more than $30,000 were donated to Arizonan families and other causes related to childhood cancer.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.7; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.2%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 50.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 61.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.