Medstar Surgery Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521061679
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Calverton, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4107726721
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $0
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- GREGORY ARGYROS (DIRECTOR): $1,391,198 total reported compensation
- ROBERT J GILBERT (CHAIR): $947,190 total reported compensation
- MARK MEGINNIS (TREASURER/DIRECTOR): $506,607 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Medstar surgery center, inc. Provides ambulatory surgical services for residents in the metropolitan Washington area.
What it reported doing in 2020
Medstar surgery center, inc. Provided ambulatory surgical services for residents in the metropolitan Washington area. The surgical services are now being conducted out of medstar surgery center at lafayette centre, llc, a single member llc of which medstar ambulatory services, inc. Is the sole member.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: NotEnoughData
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -118.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: -116.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 4 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 9 of 11 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2018 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 69 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series filing activity did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.