Medical Staff of University Hospital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 223783478
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Newark, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9739720026
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $111,768
- Expenses
- $116,298
- Assets
- $281,707
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NINA GLASS MD (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL VOSBIKIAN MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- ANNE SUTHERLAND MD (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- NINA GLASS MD (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL VOSBIKIAN MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- DIANNE SINQUEE MD (SECRETARY/TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide educational guidance to members of the medical staff, serve community and the hospital through participation and sharing medical expertise with our colleagues.
What it reported doing in 2025
Foster an atmosphere to share in medical expertise and recognition of lifetime achievements within the professional community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.4%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 74.4%; rating input score 74
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.1%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.42; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.6%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.4% of revenue deployed · 74.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $87K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.