Medical Staff of the Medical Center of Trinity Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
455519488
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Trinity, FL, USA
Phone
7278344727
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$148,540
Expenses
$208,544
Assets
$678,705
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • KEITH CHISHOLM MD (VICE CHIEF)
  • PETER DI MARTINO (CHIEF OF STAFF)
  • DAVID DIPIAZZA (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose of the Corporation is to promote the interests of its physician members who practice in the market area (the "Physician Business Community") of the Medical Center of Trinity, Inc. (the "Hospital"), in connection with their business of providing healthcare services to patients at the Hospital and elsewhere, and to provide assistance and advice to such members regarding issues relating to the hospital, their priveleges, and their business interests as such are affected by the business and healthcare activities of the Hospital.Among the critical issues facing the Physician Business Community is how to maintain their practice independence and pursue other healthcare business opportunities, while at the same time maintaining and improving their business relationships with the Hospital.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Corporation assists its members in dealing with issues with the following activities:--Periodic meetings (semi-annual) of the entire membership to inform them of issues with the Hospital, proposed changes in governing documents for the medical staff, review activities of the Hospital affecting the Physician Business Community, and provide education on current legal and healthcare issues.--Continuous meetings of other physician-Hospital committees, including the Medical Executive Committee, the Bylaws Committee, Department and Sections. Through these meetings (and activities of the Corporation's officers), there is day-to-day interaction with the Hospital regarding issues affecting the Physician Business Community, peer review activities for the Hospital medical staff are conductied, the quality and appropriateness of care given to patients at the Hospital are monitored as a general matter and also specifically with respect to different Depatments and specialties, utilization of Hospital resources affecting the Physician Business Community is managed, physician and Physcian Business Community activities are directed-including liason with the Hospital administration and its governing board.--The Corporation is a member of othe organizations which benefit physicians generally (e.g., the Florida Medical Association), which provides informaion to the Corporation for dissemination to its members.--The Corporation provides grants to health-related charitable organzations (e.g., The American Heart Associaion).

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 8
  • Transparency & Controls: 69
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 10.1%; rating input score 10
  • Program expense ratio: 7.2%; rating input score 7
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -40.4%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.25; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 10.1% of revenue deployed · 7.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $194K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 14 of 16 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Independent members within voting members did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.