Medical Staff of St Francis Medical Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
216017899
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Trenton, NJ, USA
Phone
6095995000
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$51,632
Expenses
$140,205
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LOUIS G FARES II MD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LOUIS G FARES II MD (PRESIDENT)
  • PERRY LOESBERG MD (VICE-PRESIDE)
  • NENITA MCINTOSH MD (SECRETARY/TR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Patient care, education & research

What it reported doing in 2022

Whereas st. Francis medical center, trenton, nj is a nonprofit corp. Under the laws of nj, & whereas its purpose is to serve as a general hospital providing patient care, education & research, & whereas it is recognized that the medical staff is responsible for the quality of medical care in the hospital & must accept & discharge this responsibility subject to the ultimate authority of the hospital board of trustees & the cooperative efforts of the medical staff, the ceo & the board of trustees as necessary to fulfill the hospital's objective to its patients; therefore, the physicians, dentists & doctors practicing in the hospital thereby organize themselves into a medical staff.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 4
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.8%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 26.5%; rating input score 26

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -171.5%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 18.7%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.8% of revenue deployed · 26.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $37K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.