Medicaid Health Plans of America
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900646692
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2028575720
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Business and Industry
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,934,335
- Expenses
- $4,496,616
- Assets
- $5,566,641
- Liabilities
- $3,397,844
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
46 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CRAIG KENNEDY (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CRAIG KENNEDY (PRESIDENT & CEO): $391,799 total reported compensation
- SHANNON ATTANASIO (VP GOV'T RELATIONS AND ADV): $266,048 total reported compensation
- MICHELLE PROSER (VP OF RESEARCH, QUALITY AN): $198,173 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To develop and advance public policy that controls costs and improves access and delivery of quality health care to medicaid members.
What it reported doing in 2024
Membership: mhpa is a national membership organization of medicaid health plans. Our mission is to support our members through advancing and promoting policies that result in access to quality health care for low-income families and individuals. Through advocacy, public policy and education, mhpa helps frame critical federal and state legislation that positively impacts the delivery of health care to our country's most vulnerable populations. We are committed to providing innovative health care solutions for governments that reduce costs, expand coverage and increase the timeliness and quality of public health care. Our relationships with government entities, private corporations and non-profit agencies help to meet the needs of those we serve, while increasing our commitment to constituency building and partnerships.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.9%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.61; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 40.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 42 of 42 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $392K · 46 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $337K reported
- Consistency: 14 of 15 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.