Medgar & Angela Scott Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 861922900
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Vicksburg, MS, USA
- Phone
- 7708459772
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Neighborhood Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $53,800
- Expenses
- $53,800
- Assets
- $304
- Liabilities
- $546,340
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANGELA SCOTT (CHAIR/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- JAMAICA BAKER (MEMBER)
- AVA COOLEY (MEMBER)
- ANGELA DONNELL (MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The medgar and angela scott foundation is dedicated to inspiring people to excel by providing tools and solutions that inform, educate, and encourage them to make the best possible decisions. The foundation promises to improve lives, uplift communities, and value everyone with a spirit of love, truth, humility, and service.
What it reported doing in 2024
Through the development of community enriching programs, the medgar & angela scott foundation hosted programs to serve the community. The programs include:- wisdom & grace seniors program- warren county election/polling precinct- ms state capitol tour & lunch with youth and senior groups- ms daycare training- voter registration drives - computer class by msu- meet the candidates forum- get out the vote community festival - voter engagement brunch
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.4%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 63.4%; rating input score 63
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1,797.17; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -59.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -51.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -145.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.4% of revenue deployed · 63.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.