Medevac Foundation International

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
542007236
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Alexandria, VA, USA
Phone
7038368732
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Safety Education

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,865
Expenses
$39,571
Assets
$175,670
Liabilities
$133,645

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JANA WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
  • ERICA KLEIN (VICE PRESIDENT OF STRATEGY & PROGRAMS)
  • SCOTT DAVIS (VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS)
  • BLAIR BEGGAN (VICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS)

Highest reported compensation

  • JANA WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $202,244 total reported compensation
  • ERICA KLEIN (VICE PRESIDENT OF STRATEGY & PROGRAMS): $137,327 total reported compensation
  • RYAN BUTSCHER (VICE PRES OF MEMBERSHIP & TECHNOLOGY): $136,561 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The medevac foundation international is organized exclusively for scientific, educational, and charitable purposes, to advance innovation in research, scholarship, education and well-being through philanthropic efforts for the global medical transport community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Education: mfi also provided scholarships to personnel employed in air medical services for improvement of their skills in safer and better management of patients while in the air aboard medevac helicopters.events: mfi holds in-person events throughout the year to raise awareness of the organization's mission and charitable efforts. Taking care of our own events consist of educational workshops that address the critical mental health and wellness needs of the air medical industry. Mfi also holds events at the aams air medical transport conference (amtc) to increase awareness of the foundation and acknowledge those in the air medical field.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 60
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -233.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.44; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.76; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 120.8%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.1% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -17.6% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -12.5% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $202K · 17 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.