Medards House
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474386986
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- New Cumberland, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7177742633
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Centers, Clubs
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $474,259
- Expenses
- $518,212
- Assets
- $977,221
- Liabilities
- $299,198
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SAUNDRA L COLELLO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- JEREMIAH GRUBE (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SAUNDRA L COLELLO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $45,100 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Medard's house is a christ centered ministry house that serves to be the extension of the family for teenagers. It is a safe place to socialize and bond with peers, connect with community leaders and role models, learn the value of service through provided teachings, realize talents and dreams and verbalize and immobilize fears through the love of the community and the power of the holy spirit.
What it reported doing in 2025
Medard's house acts as a second home for middle and high school youth after school and is the only free year-round program in our school district focusing on middle and high school students. Medard's house has purposefully chosen to combat the most pressing issues facing teenagers today, including obesity, drug and alcohol use, mental health, and homelessness. Medard's house offers a free, supportive teen-driven space with a hot meal served family style; multiple opportunities for sports and arts; homework help; a teen-tended garden; a large family room with couches, tvs, and video games; large open green space; and on-site mentoring. The purpose is to support teens and their families, reduce negative and self-defeating behaviors, equalize risk factors, and guide youth toward a fulfilled adulthood. Currently, the after-school program hosts about 40 youth four times per week. Over the last few months, medard's house has also used their facility as a shelter to address the pressing issue of homelessness in cumberland county. Medard's house also turns its attention to addressing a rising number of local youth and adolescents who are experiencing homelessness. Data shows there are over 80 youth and adolescents in the county known to be experiencing homelessness, a growing number of whom are concentrating in an area within a mile of medard's house. In addition, over 90% of the youth and adolescents medard's house serves reside in homes considered low- to moderate-income who may be at increased risk of homelessness. All medard's house programs are open to any and all middle and high schoolers, primarily serving cedar cliff high school and new cumberland middle school in cumberland county and regularly serving students coming from harrisburg and lemoyne. Cedar cliff high school reports 32% of their students are considered economically disadvantaged, while new cumberland reports 39% as economically disadvantaged. Almost 11% of the high school's students identify as hispanic, as do 10% of the middle school students. Both schools report about 6% of students identify as black or african americans. Demographics show that the youth who choose to attend medard's house are those who are most vulnerable, making services even more vital: 25% of youth served identify as black or african-american; 35% identify as hispanic or latinx; and 50% are supported in their schools with an individualized education program and/or live with a diagnosed mental health disorder or developmental delay. The medard's house approach addresses three key areas of youth development: character development: through mentoring, inspirational guest speakers, and spiritual instruction, we seek to build character to motivate our students toward excellence. Academic assistance: we offer homework help to all students as requested and partner with the local district to provide several extended educational opportunities, including the emerging garden-to-table program. Physical fitness: medard's house features several fun fitness activities on-site, including an indoor climbing wall and a skate park. We also partner with other nonprofits and community organizations to encourage fitness opportunities. We provide opportunities for intramural sports, summer camps, field trips, kayaking, tubing, swimming, hiking, and more.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 52
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.7%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.3%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.89; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.7%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.1% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.7% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $454K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $45K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.