Meals on Wheels of Sheboygan County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391238290
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Sheboygan, WI, USA
Phone
9204517011
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,836,794
Expenses
$1,738,507
Assets
$4,140,498
Liabilities
$64,693

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALLISON THOMPSON (CEO)
  • PAUL MENTINK (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ALLISON THOMPSON (CEO): $112,317 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide delicious, nourishing meals and wellness checks for those who are unable to obtain or prepare proper nutritional meals, regardless of race, color, ability, national origin, age or income.

What it reported doing in 2024

Meals on wheels of sheboygan county, inc., has one program, the delivery of nutritious freshly prepared, homemade meals by caring individuals who provide a smile and a quick safety check. The expenses for the program in 2024 totaled 1,573,591. We eliminated the donation software called harness and changed over to network for good. Neither program fully met our needs and we are now utilizing givesmart, as of january, as a giving/event platform. We opted not to continue the fundraiser dusk to glow, and instead created a new fundraiser, sip & savor. Tubing was added to the wildwood gardens to aid in irrigation. Additional work was done in the sensory garden to make it more aesthetically pleasing and productive. We continue to need to repair and replace some kitchen equipment. A new warming oven was purchased as a scratch and dent item. New food-safe cabinetry was added in the kitchen. The work on the database continues. We will be expanding our capacity by eliminating a large storage area and adding in a new freezer. We will then convert our current freezer to a cooler. This will double the size of our cooling space while increasing freezer space, ulimately helping us with production and storage of more meals. We were pledged a gift of 105,000 to help cover half the cost of the expansion. We currently have 24 people on staff. We fed a total of 767 unique individuals throughout the year. We continue to provide food for the aging & disability resource center's congregate meal program and in total we prepared and delivered 96,069 meals in 2024.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.9%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 90.5%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.3 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.4%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.38; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.5%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.9% of revenue deployed · 90.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $112K · 15 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $232K reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.