Meadowlark House Child Advocacy Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 473352686
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2015–2024
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
Location: Dodge City, KS, USA
Phone: 6207890396
Rating: 78
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Children's, Youth Services

Reported finances

Revenue: $142,761
Expenses: $119,251
Assets: $107,527
Liabilities: $18,197

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

Arlyn Leaming (President)

People named in this filing

Arlyn Leaming (President)
Susan Antosh (Former CAC Coordinator)
Tammi Fischer (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Organization's purpose is to provide a safe environment that promotes prevention, education, and intervention services to abused and neglected children and families.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide a safe environment that promotes prevention, education, and intervention services to abused and neglected children and families.

Operating model

Revenue model: Earned-program. 71% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 75
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 52
Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 70.2%; rating input score 70
Program expense ratio: 84.1%; rating input score 84

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: 16.5%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 38.9%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 70.2% of revenue deployed · 84.1% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $100K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.