Mead Sports Booster Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237375967
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Spokane, WA, USA
Phone
5099541214
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$90,042
Expenses
$65,619
Assets
$142,120
Liabilities
$1,100

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RACHEL RAAB (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RACHEL RAAB (PRESIDENT)
  • TRACY TAIGEN (VICE PRESIDE)
  • HEIDI ROULSTON (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To lend support, both moral and financial, to coaches, advisors, administrators and sports teams and to foster and promote an enthusiastic interest in the sports programs and their related activities at mead high school.

What it reported doing in 2024

Mead sports booster organization provides financial support to mead high school sports programs. During the year, the organization provided over 59,000 in support for various sports programs and activities at mead high school to assist in purchasing various items including gear, uniforms, equipment, and field supplies for the sports teams. The organization also promotes an enthusiastic interest in the mead high school sports programs by selling concessions and school apparel at sports and school events and hosting an annual battle of the bell rivalry game football party.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Liabilities are high compared with assets and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65.7%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 90.1%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27.1%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.17; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 65.7% of revenue deployed · 90.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $59K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.