Me Worldwide Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472721614
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Sioux Falls, SD, USA
Phone
8776974696
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Emergency Assistance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$190,194
Expenses
$80,393
Assets
$114,338
Liabilities
$765

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ERIC MCDONALD (DIRECTOR)
  • JEN SCHAEFER (DIRECTOR)
  • JENNA SMITH (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote activities to care for the poor and children and to support international orphanages.

What it reported doing in 2017

Financial support to organizations who promote activities to care for the poor and children and to support international organizations

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 12
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 8.4%; rating input score 8
  • Program expense ratio: 19.9%; rating input score 20

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 57.7%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.42; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 57.4%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -161.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 121.5% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 187.2% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 8.4% of revenue deployed · 19.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2016 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 8/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.