Me Over Pd Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 823901200
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Sarasota, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9415446307
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $206,985
- Expenses
- $81,051
- Assets
- $217,669
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Gilbert Thelen (Chairman, President)
- Struby Thelen (Director, Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Gilbert Thelen (Chairman, President)
- Struby Thelen (Director, Vice President)
- Drew Smith (Director, Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation is organized exclusively for the charitable purposes of furthering the public's and patient's knowledge and understanding of available medical expertise, treatment alternatives, drug therapies, support groups, service organizations, symptom progression and any other facets of the many forms of Parkinson's Disease and for any other charitable, religious, educational, and scientific purposes, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as charitable organizations under IRC 501(c)(3).
What it reported doing in 2024
Initiated Middle Georgia Motion Disorder Specialist (MDS) Outreach Program bringing Neurologists to Macon and adjacent communities which presently lack any such specialized expertise to conduct clinical appointments for persons with Parkinson's. The program sponsors MDS's providing clinic facilities, and defraying travel and other expenses incurred by physicians seeing new patients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 23
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 15.2%; rating input score 15
- Program expense ratio: 38.8%; rating input score 39
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 60.8%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.69; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 57% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 46.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 15.2% of revenue deployed · 38.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $31K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.