Mcpoa Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770229236
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Monterey, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8314025454
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,458
- Expenses
- $31,036
- Assets
- $5,582
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Daniel Vorhies (President)
People named in this filing
- John Tilley (Secretary)
- Andrew Ausonio (Director)
- Daniel Vorhies (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Bring property owners together to enhance the aesthetic and business atmospherefor all of monterey. To preserve and protect property rights, retain and enhancevalues of properties and businesses and to help to create a strong and sustainableeconomy in monterey. To develop a plan to speed up and streamline planning andbuilding department processing. To encourage useage and zoning standards, eliminating unreasonable restrictions in the process. To develop incentiveprograms to attract tenants and users to monterey. To enlist city cooperation andincentives to assist such programs. To enhance historical areas, buildings andmonuments. To work with other organizations, associations and governmentalentities to serve monterey 's needs and to bring monterey business people together.to develeop and attract business environment that brings a diverse mix ofbusinesses that make downtown monterey a magnet for shoppers, residents, touristsand clients for a wide range of professional services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Primary activity presenting public forums as to water issues, county and city planning issues on the monterey peninsula
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 10
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 12.2%; rating input score 12
- Program expense ratio: 7.7%; rating input score 8
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -59.5%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 102.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -19.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 12.2% of revenue deployed · 7.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 12/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.