Mclennan County Dispute Resolution Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742799661
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Waco, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2547520955
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $186,876
- Expenses
- $159,934
- Assets
- $203,236
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Katherine Logue (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Anna Clark-Martinez (Immediate Past Chairperson)
- Anna Futral (Treasurer)
- Chris Jaeger (Chairperson)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Alternative dispute resolution training and service.
What it reported doing in 2024
The McLennan County Dispute Resolution Center provides quality, low-cost mediations and provides space for other dispute resolution matters. During Fiscal Year 2025, 95 cases were mediated using volunteer mediators in addition to our Executive Director who is a mediator. The majority of the mediations were classified as family law and Child Protective Services cases which require a great deal of preparation as well as actual mediation hours. Many referrals were made and/or information given when mediation was not the appropriate, could not be scheduled by agreement of the parties, or the matter was outside our income limits. The DRC receives many inquiries from people looking for legal assistance, something that mediators and the DRC are unable to provide. We refer these callers to several other agencies and organizations. The DRC provides affordable, quality mediation in civil and family law cases to qualifying parties who might not otherwise be able to afford mediation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.4%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.27; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 47.4%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $163K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.