Mclaughlin Research Institute for Biomedical Sciences Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810459235
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Great Falls, MT, USA
Phone
4064546015
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,929,875
Expenses
$5,027,548
Assets
$15,453,649
Liabilities
$769,431

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RENEE REIJO PERA (PRESIDENT)
  • MEGANNE CASEY (VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS)

Highest reported compensation

  • RENEE REIJO PERA (PRESIDENT): $229,098 total reported compensation
  • TERESA GUNN (PROFESSOR): $132,345 total reported compensation
  • MEGANNE CASEY (VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS): $126,755 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The institute's mission is to improve human health through innovative genetic research and education. Research at the institute focuses on understanding the genetic control of normal development and susceptibility to neurological diseases using the mouse as the model system. The institute also offers research internships for students and teachers.

What it reported doing in 2024

During fiscal year 2025, the institute scientists and staff continued their efforts to better understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms of neurodegenerative disease processes through innovative genetic approaches in murine models, translational research on treatment advances and expansion of rural health research through education, community engagement, and student training programs. The research focus has expanded to include cellular and molecular mechanisms of misfolded protein propagation in diseases such as alzheimer's and parkinson's diseases, prion diseases and amyolateral sclerosis; extracellular trafficking in macular degeneration; including novel screening and treatment approaches. Further advancement in rural health research, the institute expanded efforts to include early screening for pediatric anxiety and continued plans for future studies in schizophrenia. Such work included partnerships with up to 10 collaborators and 18 projects among investigators with partnerships extending across Montana and nationally to New York and New Jersey, Massachusetts, North Carolina and California which resultant subawards contributed to $803,000 of nih grant funded support and $364,000 in research contracts. Efforts continued towards understanding alzheimer's disease with partners at columbia university and wake forest university; prion diseases with partners at the broad & prion alliance. Investigators continued critical work on novel treatment development screening through ongoing collaborationwith pharmaceutical companies and welcomed new collaborations with silver lake research & boston children's hospital. The institute continued efforts through nih funded grants (awarded 2024) in the amount of $2.9m for the first year and 2.6m/year for following four years launching the novel center for integrated biomedical and ruralhealth research focused on distributed research support for new investigators; $630,000/year for five years of neuroinflammation in alzheimer's disease model research. Additional nih funds through transfer from duke university concluded the investigation of extracellular vesicles in age related macular degeneration. A portion of funds, $196,500 was awarded to the institute from the murdock foundation to support the purchase and implementation of a small animal magnetic resonance imager. The institute received $1.01m in contributions that included $770,250 in research and education support from affiliate, touro university. These funds were utilized to support ongoing research and education as well as fundamental infrastructure support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 70% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.6%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 95.8%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: $140.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.2%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.07; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.9%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.6% of revenue deployed · 95.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $4.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $229K · 14 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.