MCEL United

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
853129003
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Riverview, FL, USA
Phone
4075040553
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,631,874
Expenses
$2,403,592
Assets
$1,644,925
Liabilities
$471,576

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HARRISON PETERS (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • HARRISON PETERS (CEO): $180,625 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We partner with leaders and systems to design supportive, inclusive environments that value diverse leadership and ensure every student has access to the opportunities, resources, and experiences needed to thrive in school and in life.

What it reported doing in 2024

Resilient representative leadership framework: mcel disseminated and scaled the "resilient representative leadership framework," featuring the 10 essential competencies for leaders of color. This groundbreaking framework is poised to revolutionize how leaders of color navigate spaces that were historically not designed to foster their success.the toolkit is a comprehensive collection of resources to support individual leaders and educational systems in evaluating practices and creating conditions conducive to success, particularly for leaders of color. This versatile toolkit is applicable at all levels of leadership and includes:- 10 essential competencies for educational leaders of color outline the knowledge, skills, mindsets, dispositions, and behaviors most critical to the success of diverse leaders.- the guidebook consolidates advice for leaders of color who are planning their pathways into educational leadership, rerouting around a career roadblock, or navigating a difficult or unexpected development in their leadership journeys. This also is a resource for equity-minded allies when they need advice and support to be part of the big, bold systemic solutions we desperately need.- executive summary highlights the urgent need, framework, and toolkit resources.- critical background research demonstrates why we need a guidebook for educational leaders of color, the barriers preventing educators of color from accessing leadership opportunities, and strategies to attract and sustain educational leaders of color.- policy brief helps local, state, and federal policymakers consider ways to propel action to increase the racial, ethnic, and cultural diversity of the nation's school and system-level leaders.mcel network members and partners gain access to a more expansive suite of resources that fuel growth-focused self-reflection as well as transformational systemic support for educators of color at all stages of their careers:- self-reflection tool encourages leaders of color to charge and regularly re-energize their leadership by engaging in purposeful self-reflection, prioritizing self-care, and nurturing the relationships that sustain them.- 360 assessment tool enables leaders of color to solicit and receive feedback from their peers, mentors, staff, and other stakeholders.- transformational conversations tool assists anyone to be a great co-pilot to leaders of color they formally or informally support along their leadership journeys.- systems transformation tool helps district, charter network, and organizational leaders create more welcoming, supportive conditions for educators of color at all stages of their careers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $19.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.7%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 105% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 66.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 58.8% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 5 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 78% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 7 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $181K · 4 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.