Mcdonogh Parents Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
526019724
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Owings Mills, MD, USA
Phone
4103630600
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$51,401
Expenses
$49,213
Assets
$137,294
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELIZABETH INSLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • OMARI JACKSON (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ELIZABETH INSLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • OMARI JACKSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KRISTIN MCCARTHY (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mcdonogh parents association is a supporting organization of mcdonogh school, inc. Mcdonogh school is an education organization which is exempt from federal income tax pursuant to irc 501(c)(3).

What it reported doing in 2018

Mcdonogh parents association is a supporting organization of mcdonogh school, inc., a 501(c)(3) organization. Grants were made to support the school's programs. Additional expenses were incurred for an after-prom party, field trips, and other student programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.2%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 74.7%; rating input score 75

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.3%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.79; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.2% of revenue deployed · 74.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $37K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2009 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.