Mccloud Community Resource Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510417339
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Mccloud, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5309643250
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Libraries
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $48,938
- Expenses
- $45,653
- Assets
- $12,320
- Liabilities
- $1,144
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARGOT GRIFFOM (PAST PRESIDENT)
- ANN MERO (President)
People named in this filing
- MARGOT GRIFFOM (PAST PRESIDENT)
- CHUCK OTT (PAST PERSIDENT)
- LISA MCCAULEY (FRM EXEC DIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve early childhood development and family support services in mccloud, ca and the surrounding area.
What it reported doing in 2015
Accomplishments for year include using our current funding for our community support programs we have served a generous portion of the McCloud population. We implemented a Girls Circle program that helps promote self esteem and community involvement. Teens Helping Seniors have been beneficial to both the teens and the seniors, meeting the needs of the community by promoting self reliance for seniors and work experience for teens. These teens were also used in the Clean up McCloud event. Our Father/Child Bar-B-Q and Summer Fun program was able to help parents interact with their children and promote healthy living habits. Our Senior in Need program assisted many of our homebound seniors with heating, food and clothing. We send a newsletter to residents by mail and our mental health services and senior services continue to be a welcomed in our community. We have maintained a majority of our programs from previous years and continue to build on our successes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.3%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.7%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.4% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -16% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $46K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2011 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.