Mccj Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
203534284
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Coral Gables, FL, USA
Phone
3057556096
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Intergroup, Race Relations

Reported finances

Revenue
$429,963
Expenses
$464,273
Assets
$89,399
Liabilities
$215,668

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MATTHEW S ANDERSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MATTHEW S ANDERSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $112,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mccj advances understanding and respect for all faiths, races and cultures through advocacy, education, dialogue and conflict resolution. We embrace diversity, provide safe havens for dialog and training inclusive leaders.

What it reported doing in 2024

In order to fulfill our mission of embracing diversity and building an inclusive miami, we brought the community together to foster meaningful dialogue, celebrate leadership, and empower youth voices. This was accomplished through impactful initiatives such as hosting our annual humanitarian dinner, where we honored civic leaders who embody our values of unity and inclusion. Additionally, we continued to provide transformative experiences for high school students through metrotown, an immersive camp that equips young leaders with tools to champion diversity and equity. We also expanded our can we talk series, creating spaces for open and honest discussions around critical issues affecting our community. Through interfaith meetings, we strengthened relationships between diverse religious and cultural groups, reinforcing our commitment to building bridges across differences. These efforts, along with other initiatives, continue to strengthen miami's social fabric and advance our vision of a more connected and inclusive community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 77.7%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.99 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.41; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24.1%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84% of revenue deployed · 77.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $361K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $112K · 19 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.