Mccall Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
060961756
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Torrington, CT, USA
Phone
8604962100
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$20,689,159
Expenses
$20,333,121
Assets
$15,078,864
Liabilities
$5,043,952

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Maria Coutant-Skinner (CEO)
  • Joseph Stanley (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Maria Coutant-Skinner (CEO): $280,658 total reported compensation
  • Joy Pendola (Clinical Officer): $228,070 total reported compensation
  • Rosamma Vithayathil (CFO): $203,473 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

McCall is a Nonprofit Organization which inspires hope and promotes wellness and healing through a continuum of behavioral health services prevention, treatment, recovery support, and community engagement for individuals of all ages and families across Connecticut.

What it reported doing in 2024

Outpatient services All curriculum used in McCalls programing is evidenced-based, gender-specific, trauma-informed, and tailored to the needs of the clients we serve, considering the client's needs in family and community context. McCall understands that behavioral health treatment must be highly individualized to a clients needs, and so McCall offers multiple levels of care and multiple care modalities. We offer a full continuum of outpatient services starting with a comphrehensive bio-pyscho-social evaluation followed by individual counseling, intensive outpatient treatment, or a variety of outpatient support groups such as Relapse Prevention, Anger Management, Womens Wellness, to name a few. Additionally, we offer case management, and recovery coaching services to successfully link clients to services that meet each of their assessed needs including employment services, social programs, medical care, home-based services, transportation assistance, and continued care. We offer highly specialized interventions to help people heal from the root causes of their pain including EMDR, auricular acupuncture, medication assisted therapies and full range of psychiatric services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.9%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 73.8%; rating input score 74
  • Fundraising efficiency: $29.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.7%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.33; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.9% of revenue deployed · 73.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 10 filed program accomplishments · $15M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $281K · 21 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1M reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.