Mca Revere Realty Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472253097
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
El Paso, TX, USA
Phone
9156132478
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,560,844
Expenses
$1,803,612
Assets
$16,049,380
Liabilities
$17,794,796

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CARLOS ORTEGA (CEO AND CFO)

Highest reported compensation

  • CARLOS ORTEGA (CEO AND CFO): $258,913 total reported compensation
  • XAVIER CARDENAS (SR DIRECTOR. ENGINEERING): $157,187 total reported compensation
  • NANCY LOWERY (SR. DIRECTOR OF INNOVATION): $149,968 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation is organized for the exclusive purpose of being a supporting organization to medical center of the americas foundation within the meaning of section 509(a)(3); to encourage, assist in the establishment of a non-profit medical center in el paso, Texas; participate in or have a substantial presence at such medical center; facilitate, promote, or conduct medical research and education to address health issues impacting the greater el paso, Texas geographic area; or facilitate, promote or conduct the process of making successful research and healthcare outcomes accessible to patients regardless of their ability to pay.

What it reported doing in 2025

Mca revere realty, inc. Leases a 33,500 sq. Ft. Mental wellness facility to the u.s. Department of veterans affairs pursuant to a 20 year term lease with the u.s. Government. Previously, mca revere realty, inc. Had acquired 10 acres of land during 2014 as part of a plan for future development that will facilitate biomedical innovation and improve healthcare access and quality in conjunction with, and support of, the medical center of the americas foundation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 60
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Limited
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15.6%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.9; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.11; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 23.9% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 24.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $259K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.