Mayview Mo Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 472895639
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Odessa, MO, USA
- Phone
- 8163098418
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Economic Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $180,939
- Expenses
- $106,021
- Assets
- $456,803
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TIM BARNES (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TIM BARNES (PRESIDENT)
- TINA USSERY FRANKLIN (VICE-PRESIDE)
- JENNA SOENDLER (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To revitalize the city of mayview, Missouri by encouraging a clean, safe environment for citizen and business growth.
What it reported doing in 2024
Since the old school building was purchased in 2015, many improvements have been made to the school buildings and property in fulfilling the mission of the mayview Missouri foundation (mmf). The property and buildings provide a place for people to meet, grow their businesses, and gather as a community. The gym has been used by fortyville 4h group, county 4h organization, habitat for humanity, and mayview community trunk or treat. Volleyball and basketball teams have used it for practice. Organizations are not charged for using the gym. Families and other groups have rented the facility for their events. Mayview history museum highlights the history of the mayview community which was founded in 1866 and in the late 1800's was the largest producer of apples in the county. The annual fall festival celebrates that heritage with traditional apple butter making, hayrides, and other events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.1%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 98.1%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 41.4%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.31; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.5% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.1% of revenue deployed · 98.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $104K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.