Mayport Waterfront Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
593524226
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Atlantic Beach, FL, USA
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$51,338
Expenses
$37,785
Assets
$41,134

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Alyce Decker (Past chairChair)
  • Matt Stewart (Past Vice-chair Executive Eco-Tourism)
  • Bill Gulliford (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote interest knowledge appreciation of the history and purpose of Mayport area of Duval County Florida through restoration preservation and beautification of lands and buildings of historic and educational significance in conjunction with the Cities of Jacksonville Florida and Atlantic Beach Florida. The corporation shall dedicate itself by social historical and educational means to such purpose by preserving objects of historical significance and by focusing on encouraging beautification and enhancement projects.

What it reported doing in 2025

Community Beautification and Preservation - Conducted community beautification and preservation projects to improve the appearance safety and historic character of the Mayport waterfront area. Activities included repair restoration painting and replacement of deteriorated structures as part of grant-funded community improvement initiatives.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 53
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 46.6%; rating input score 47
  • Program expense ratio: 63.3%; rating input score 63

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.4%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -65.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -39.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 34.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 46.6% of revenue deployed · 63.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $24K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.