Mayfield High School Parents'

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 850465354
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2009–2017
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2017
Location: Las Cruces, NM, USA
Rating: 85
Verdict: STRONG
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue: $42,103
Expenses: $46,333
Assets: $7,315

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

DEANNA WRIGHT (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

DEANNA WRIGHT (PRESIDENT)
ADRIANA BUSTILLOS (VICE-PRESIDE)
MISTY SALAZAR (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promote interest in choral music education among high school students.

What it reported doing in 2017

Promoting interest in choral music amoung high school students by assisting and supporting the choral music program, developing and presenting choral music concerts.

Operating model

Revenue model: Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 100
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 24
Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
Program expense ratio: 99.4%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: -10%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.4% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $46K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Filing history: 9 filing years from 2009 to 2017
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.