Maui Nui Empowered

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
921514885
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Kahului, HI, USA
Phone
8082980499
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$172,000
Expenses
$243,676
Assets
$70,385

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dave Ward (President)
  • Dwight Burns (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Bruce U'u term ended 102024 (Executive Dir.)
  • Dave Ward (President)
  • Lelani Pulmano (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Maui Nui Empowered is a collective of dedicated Maui County residents united by a shared commitment to safe guarding the islands local values. Our mission is to preserve Maui Countys rich cultural heritage while driving economic growth that benefits our community. We strive to cultivate a thriving economy that generates job opportunities and affordable housing options for local residents, ensuring a brighter future for generations to come. Our efforts involve endorsing pro-economy candidates, collaborating with government leaders to implement impactful policies, and educating both the community and decision makers on key issues concerning jobs, housing, and the economy.

What it reported doing in 2024

Educating Maui's voters of the issues critical to our County (housing, economy and quality of life), informing voters of the current situation and the challenges facing our County via small gatherings of citizens. Conducting interviews and polls to determine issues of greatest concerns to residents.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -41.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -72.2% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -67.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.